[ad_1]
Manchester City has initiated new legal action against the Premier League, saying that recent changes in financial rules would unjust certain clubs, including Arsenal. According to the Citizens, this situation places them in a position of “discrimination”.
Manchester City relaunched the legal war with the Premier League. According to the club, changes have been made to financial regulations that have unjustly favored rival clubs, including Arsenal.
According to The Timesthe club challenges the lack of control over the financial contributions of club owners, who are not subject to the same verifications as other financial agreements. A disparity, according to City, which distorts competition.
The club also complains about the impact on the integrity of the competition, believing that the current framework of the Premier League does not respect fundamental principles such as transparency, equity and proportionality. In its press release, Manchester City stresses that this “preferential and discriminatory treatment” of the loans granted by the shareholders leads to a financial imbalance within the championship.
Impressive amounts
This legal appeal follows a previous decision of a court which had judged certain aspects of the APT regulation of the Premier League as Invalides. The lawyers had ruled on the fact that the modified rules were inapplicable. Following this judgment, Manchester City demands the restoration of the rules prior to 2021, claiming that current modifications continue to promote certain clubs and lack transparency.
The Manchester City club also accuses Arsenal, Brighton, Everton and Leicester City to operate under a “preferential exemption”, allowing them to benefit from substantial loans. Manchester City highlights impressive figures: Arsenal would have received 259 million pounds sterling of loans in 2022-2023, Brighton 406.5 million pounds in 2021-2022, Everton 450 million pounds in 2022-2023 and Leicester 265 million pounds in 2021-2022. According to City, these loans are a major economic advantage, escaping the same standards as their own sponsorship income.
[ad_2]
