“This Isn’t College Basketball Anymore”: How Recruiting Norms Are Being Killed by Revenue and the Portal

College basketball has long been celebrated as a defining chapter in the American sports landscape, a place where young athletes chase dreams of glory, education, and potential professional careers. Yet, as the landscape evolves, the traditional norms and values that once shaped college basketball recruiting are being uprooted by seismic shifts in how revenue, NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) deals, and the transfer portal reshape the game. The result? “It’s business now, not just scholarships anymore,” a phrase increasingly echoed among coaches, players, and analysts.

As we look toward the 2026 recruiting class, it is clear that the world of college basketball recruiting has entered an era where money, player movement, and personal branding dominate more than ever before. This transformation is redefining what it means to be a college athlete and changing how programs build their teams, manage talent, and compete for championships.

For decades, college basketball recruiting was largely a straightforward process: coaches scouted high school talent, evaluated fit and potential, and offered scholarships as a blend of athletic opportunity and academic education. The relationship was primarily transactional—schools provided opportunities and scholarships, players committed to developing within a program’s system, and fans followed the stories of young athletes growing and competing for pride and glory.

Recruiting pitches centered around education, legacy, and the chance to play on a storied stage. Coaches prided themselves on developing players, helping them mature both on and off the court. The recruiting calendar was fixed, rules regulated contact, and players typically committed for several years, building team chemistry and continuity.

That model started to show signs of strain in the 2010s with the emergence of one-and-done prospects and early departures to the NBA. But it was the introduction of NIL rights and the transfer portal that truly shattered long-standing recruiting norms.

The NCAA’s landmark decision in 2021 to allow athletes to profit from their name, image, and likeness shattered the amateurism model that had governed college sports for a century. Suddenly, players were no longer just athletes or students—they were entrepreneurs, social media influencers, and brands in their own right.

NIL deals have turned recruiting on its head by fundamentally altering the value proposition for recruits. Whereas before, players were mostly interested in a school’s program, coaching, and exposure to scouts, now potential endorsement deals, sponsorships, and local market opportunities weigh heavily in their decisions.

For example, a top recruit might choose a mid-major program in a major media market like Los Angeles or New York City over a blue-blood program in a smaller market because of the potential for NIL deals. Social media followers and personal branding have become recruitment assets themselves, and coaches often seek out players with high marketability.

This shift means programs have to factor in NIL potential as much as on-court fit when courting players. It also means recruits often enter the college ranks with more bargaining power and awareness of their own commercial potential than ever before.

Parallel to NIL, the NCAA transfer portal has created a dynamic free agency-like market within college basketball. Introduced in 2018, the portal allows players to enter their name into a database that lets other programs contact them about transferring without penalty.

Previously, transferring was cumbersome and fraught with restrictions, including sitting out a year. The portal, coupled with immediate eligibility rules for transfers, has led to an unprecedented level of player movement. Programs no longer have guaranteed rosters beyond a season or two; continuity is harder to maintain.

Recruiting now includes chasing not only high school prospects but also established college players looking for better situations—more playing time, better NIL opportunities, or stronger chances to compete. Coaches must constantly manage roster turnover and adapt to quickly changing team compositions.

For recruits in the 2026 class, this means they’re entering a college environment where their peers can—and often do—move freely between programs. The promise of a long-term stay at one school is less certain, further fueling the transactional nature of recruiting.

Underpinning both the rise of NIL and the transfer portal is the growing influence of revenue in college basketball. The sport generates billions through TV contracts, merchandising, ticket sales, and sponsorships. As programs chase these dollars, the pressure to win—and to land the biggest names—has intensified.

Recruiting has become a business operation within athletic departments, with significant budgets dedicated to analytics, scouting services, recruiting coordinators, and even NIL deal facilitation. Coaches are often judged not just by wins and losses but by their ability to sign marquee prospects who can drive ticket sales, TV ratings, and social media engagement.

The 2026 recruiting class will enter a landscape where schools compete not just on the basketball court but in the marketplace for attention and profit. This commercial aspect often skews recruiting priorities toward high-profile players, sometimes at the expense of team fit or academic priorities.

The evolving recruiting landscape presents significant opportunities for players in the 2026 class and beyond. They now have greater agency to shape their own paths, leverage their brands, and maximize financial benefits while still in school.

However, these changes also introduce new pressures and uncertainties. The constant roster turnover can lead to unstable team environments. NIL deals can distract from academics and team dynamics. The commercialization of recruiting can sometimes prioritize marketability over development or personal fit.

Moreover, players must navigate a more complex world with agents, brand managers, and legal considerations, adding layers of complexity to what was once a simpler journey focused on basketball and education.

Coaches in the modern recruiting era must be adept not only at evaluating talent but also at managing relationships, marketing their programs for NIL, and handling the realities of roster fluidity. They often engage in multi-channel recruiting efforts, combining traditional scouting with social media outreach and NIL opportunity presentation.

Some programs have embraced this new era by building NIL support infrastructures, connecting players with local businesses, and educating athletes on branding. Others struggle to keep pace, especially those without strong donor bases or media markets.

The ability to manage transfers is also critical. Coaches must create welcoming environments that attract transfers, balance the roster, and maintain team chemistry amid constant change.

The class of 2026 is poised to fully experience the new recruiting reality. These recruits have grown up watching social media stars, one-and-done NBA prospects, and NIL deals reshape college basketball’s ecosystem. They understand that college sports is as much about business and personal branding as it is about competition.

Recruiting cycles will continue to accelerate. Expect more early commitments and decommitments, as players test offers across programs seeking the best financial and developmental fit. NIL marketplaces may expand with new platforms connecting athletes to brands nationwide. Transfers may increase as players seek better NIL or playing time opportunities.

This class will serve as a bellwether for how sustainable and effective these new recruiting norms are. Will these changes enhance player empowerment and program success, or will they erode traditional values and collegiate identity?

The phrase “this isn’t college basketball anymore” reflects the deep and lasting transformation recruiting has undergone. Revenue pressures, NIL rights, and the transfer portal have reshaped the recruiting landscape from a tradition-bound, education-centric model into a fast-paced, business-driven marketplace.

While this evolution offers players unprecedented opportunities for agency and financial gain, it also challenges the core values of college basketball as a developmental and team-oriented sport. The 2026 recruiting class will navigate these new realities, embodying both the promises and pitfalls of the sport’s ongoing metamorphosis.

For programs, coaches, and fans alike, understanding and adapting to these changes is crucial. Recruiting is no longer just about scholarships or the love of the game—it’s a multifaceted business balancing education, commerce, and competition. In this new era, college basketball recruiting will continue to evolve, but whether it can retain its soul remains an open question.

Would you like me to also help with citations, examples, or quotes to strengthen this essay? Or perhaps expand on any section further?