According to Warriors reports, Kevin Durant didn’t want a reunion trade because of Steve Kerr.

Recent reports emanating from the Golden State Warriors camp have shed new light on the persistent rumors of a Kevin Durant reunion. Despite rampant speculation and apparent efforts by the Warriors to bring him back to the Bay Area, it has now been widely reported that Kevin Durant himself did not want a reunion trade, with head coach Steve Kerr being a primary reason.1 This revelation, particularly detailed by Logan Murdock of The Ringer, paints a complex picture of Durant’s past and present relationship with the Warriors’ coaching staff, challenging the long-held narrative that his departure was solely about Draymond Green.

For years, the infamous on-court argument between Draymond Green and Kevin Durant during the 2018-19 season was pinpointed as the catalyst for Durant’s eventual departure to the Brooklyn Nets.2 The perception was that the locker room friction, specifically with Green, made his stay untenable. However, Murdock’s report suggests a more nuanced reality: “Durant’s exit from the Bay Area arguably had more to do with his issues with Steve Kerr than any shouting match with Green.” This is a significant shift in understanding one of the most consequential free agent decisions in recent NBA history.

The report details that Durant “repeatedly complained both publicly and privately about Kerr’s offensive principles during his final season with the Warriors, and he continued to do so even after he left for Brooklyn.”3 This insight reveals a deeper, more fundamental disagreement than mere personality clashes. While Durant thrived offensively in Golden State, winning two Finals MVPs, it appears he grew increasingly frustrated with the Warriors’ fluid, read-and-react motion offense. Durant, a transcendent individual talent, arguably preferred a system that allowed for more isolation plays and direct control over the ball, leveraging his one-on-one scoring prowess more consistently.

Kerr’s philosophy, rooted in ball movement, player movement, and unselfish play, emphasizes team cohesion and exploiting defensive rotations through passing. While this system brought unprecedented success, including three championships (two with Durant), it also meant that Durant, arguably the most individually gifted scorer on the planet, was sometimes asked to operate within parameters that he felt restricted his full offensive repertoire, especially in crucial playoff moments when defenses tightened up. His complaints about the predictability of the offense in the later rounds of the playoffs, and the need for more “individual play” and “isos,” have been well-documented even post-Warriors.

It’s important to note that the relationship between Durant and Kerr reportedly reconciled since his departure. They even worked together with Team USA in the Paris Olympics, a scenario where coaches and star players often put aside club-level differences for national pride. However, despite this reconciliation, “league sources identify Kerr as among the reasons Durant opted not to return to Golden State at the trade deadline” in February 2025 (when the Warriors reportedly made a strong push for a reunion).

This brings us to the recent past. The Golden State Warriors, facing an aging core and a desire to return to championship contention, reportedly made significant efforts to acquire Durant from the Phoenix Suns.4 General Manager Mike Dunleavy Jr. and owner Joe Lacob were reportedly keen on bringing him back, believing a reunion with Stephen Curry, Klay Thompson, and Draymond Green could reignite their dynasty. Draymond Green himself stated that Lacob had informed him a Durant trade was “about to happen” at the 2025 NBA Trade Deadline. However, Durant ultimately vetoed any such move, and the Suns instead traded him to the Houston Rockets in June 2025.5

When questioned about why Durant might have rejected a reunion, Steve Kerr himself offered a diplomatic perspective in February 2025, stating, “I don’t blame Kevin one bit for not wanting to rerun things here.6 He took so much sh** for like, ‘Oh, you’re jumping on the bandwagon’ [when he signed with Golden State in 2016]. And then he’s Finals MVP two years in a row. It’s like he still gets criticized. So why would he want to face all that B.S. again?” Kerr’s public stance suggested an understanding of the external pressure Durant faced.

However, Murdock’s report introduces the internal dynamic as a more significant factor. While external criticism was undoubtedly a burden for Durant, the report asserts that his core issues with Kerr’s offensive principles played a more decisive role in his unwillingness to return. This is not to say that the relationship with Green was insignificant, but rather that the coaching philosophy was a deeper, more persistent point of contention.

Durant, in typical fashion, took to social media (X/Twitter) to publicly refute Murdock’s report, stating, “We still on this??? Obvious opportunity for Logan Murdock to gain even more attention and try too revive his career by using my name and the Warriors. The audience is SICK AND TIRED of the same bullshit narrative. Be better my man.” While Durant’s tweet aggressively denies the report, it’s also characteristic of his often defensive and combative social media presence when faced with narratives he dislikes. His denial doesn’t necessarily invalidate the sentiment reported by league sources, as players often prefer to control their own narratives.

  • Seeking Full Control: Durant’s journey since leaving the Warriors – through Brooklyn, Phoenix, and now Houston – has arguably been a quest for an offense that fully maximizes his individual scoring talent without perceived restrictions. In Brooklyn, he had more isolation opportunities. In Phoenix, the “Big Three” experiment initially seemed to promise shared responsibility, but his move to Houston could be another attempt to be the undisputed focal point of an emerging offense.
  • A Contentious History: This report adds another layer to Durant’s complex legacy. While his championships with the Warriors are undeniable, the continued narrative around his discontent, whether with teammates or coaches, suggests an underlying dissatisfaction that has driven many of his career moves.
  • The “Coach-Killer” Trope: While unfair, reports of clashes with coaches can lead to this perception. Durant’s denial suggests he’s aware of such potential labels and is trying to actively manage his public image.
  • Validation of Offensive Philosophy: Despite Durant’s alleged complaints, Kerr’s system has undeniably delivered championships both before and after Durant’s tenure (including the 2022 title). This reinforces that Kerr’s offensive principles are effective, even if they don’t perfectly suit every superstar’s preference for individual scoring volume.
  • Draymond Green’s Role Re-evaluated: If Kerr’s offensive principles were a greater factor than Green’s argument, it somewhat lessens the sole blame placed on Green for Durant’s initial departure. It suggests a more fundamental strategic misalignment rather than just a personal feud.
  • Future Recruitment: The Warriors’ ability to attract future superstars might be slightly impacted if there’s a perception that Kerr’s system might not fully cater to a player’s individual offensive desires. However, the allure of playing with Stephen Curry and competing for championships remains a strong draw.

In conclusion, the revelation that Kevin Durant reportedly rejected a reunion trade with the Golden State Warriors due to issues with Steve Kerr’s offensive principles significantly reshapes the narrative of his career and his time in Golden State. While Durant has publicly denied the report, the consistent nature of the claims from league sources suggests a deeper, philosophical disagreement that transcended any individual personality clashes. This new understanding highlights Durant’s apparent consistent desire for an offensive system that maximizes his individual scoring genius, and it reaffirms Steve Kerr’s unwavering commitment to the Warriors’ established, championship-winning offensive identity, even if it meant forgoing a reunion with one of the greatest scorers of all time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *