
[ad_1]
PSG really only needed an hour to have the haven, delivering a last half hour rather poor but winning despite everything (2-1). Back on the individual performance of Parisians on a case -by -case basis.
Safonov: The Russian goalkeeper went to find at the bottom of his nets the only opposing shot, but it is hard to reproach him for this action, even if his relaxation may have seemed late. For the rest, the usual lining was very precise at the foot as soon as it was asked and it had been inspired on several Le Havre centers in the first period, notably signing an excellent outing in front of its goal on one of them.
Judge: Captain of the day, he started with a failed revival fortunately not very well exploited then he quickly recovered. During the time of play he played, Paris dominated largely and the Moroccan was therefore able to have his usual activity and move forward practically with each action. Technically clean and able to combine with Mbaye in front of him, he often found himself near the surface, giving some good balloons. Defensively, it was sometimes a little just.
Nuno Mendes replaced him and he positioned himself on the left side, necessarily, first behind then in winger. Entered when PSG was starting to get lost, it did neither better nor worse than the others.
Beraldo: Again in the right axis associated with a new partner, the Brazilian signed a positive meeting, but which could have been very positive. Defensively, he has long been impeccable, managing the Le Havre counter as best as possible, but he also found himself in difficulty on a few actions at the end of the match, being eliminated a little quickly on several occasions. With the ball, the story is the same with an impeccable Brazilian and even more during most of the match before missing avoidable axial reminders at the end of the game.
Hernandez : For once positioned in the left axis, the Paris defender was as a whole less in difficulty than when he evolves on the side. Seriously and applied in duels in general, it was well missed on an occasion but its presence was positive overall. With the ball, he tried to give the impulse from the back. Not a big match, but a step forward.
Zaïre-Emery: Unexpected left rear, the usual midfielder was “Sacrified” In this position as his coach admitted and he logically had trouble, both to complete his corridor and to revive this unnatural side for him. In this position, Zaïre-Emery seemed to seek his foot strongly permanently and he had trouble being defensively, despite a big return at the end of the first period. Passed in the middle for the end of the match, he was not much more dominant and, surprisingly, he continued to be physically undermined in duels.
Lee Kang-in : Positioned as a more than a traditional sentry environment, the South Korean needed a few minutes to take the measure of his post but he then delivered a first period of beautiful, alternating the superb openings to fuel his attackers and the wise and well felt dribbles to bring the ball higher. His first period was probably his best of 2025 but he fell into influence and accuracy after the break, which is not illogical when he had not been holder for more than a month and barely played. Only downside to his performance, his corners were all easily cleared.
Neves replaced him and he signed a completely neutral entry, bringing neither offensively nor defensively.
Gifted : In a rather vague and hard environment to describe, it was simply everywhere, from recovery to finish through creation. His first quarter of an hour of play is even a football exhibition, absolutely succeeding in the image of his goal which he initiated and then concluded. The continuation was inevitably less positive, with some delicacies ball to the foot and a selfishness that has not paid but also a real waste in front of the goal. This does not change that he was present defensively from start to finish, that he initiated a good number of Parisian actions and that he could have been decisive, as a scorer or a smuggler, on several occasions. Little more, he also technically enjoys and signed some individual actions of all beautiful.
Chanterze replaced her for the last ten minutes, being solid.
Mayulu: For his first tenure for a month and a half, the young environment has not taken a long time to put himself in the match and his projections towards the opposing surface were dangerous from the start of the match. Technically inspired, on the other hand, he needed a little time to manage to find correctness in the surface but he succeeded brilliantly on the 2-0. On the other hand, it is largely dominated in the defensive duel in stride on 2-1. Repositioned in the role of Hakimi for the last half hour, he also managed good things in this position, with the presence on both sides of the field.
Mbaye: Holder as in August against the same opponent, he quickly tried to grasp his luck but needed a little time of adaptation to find correctness in his attempts, whether dribbles or passes. But once launched, we finally saw the talented winger who wreaked havoc in U19, with well -felt passes from the side, precise discrepancies and insertions to the heart of the game. Goutout could even have validated his first decisive pass but he stumbled on Gorgelin. Defensively, he also worked and therefore signed his first real pro match with PSG.
Vitinha replaced him to reorganize the team and he initially held the ball a little better, but he nevertheless pointed out by a new embarrassing error in recovery.
Ramos : The Portuguese center forward was able to find the path of the net by being well placed to conclude but it is probably its only good action in the opposing surface, which is already a problem given its profile. Not easy to find in the area for his partners, he also showed real clumsiness in front of the goal during a good part of the match. In his discounts far from the goal, the Portuguese was however more interesting but his accuracy in the game was lost as the goal approaches, except when he erased to let the goalkeeper challenge. A very complicated match in the end, but a decisive goal on the clock.
Barcola: The left winger signed a good first period overall, a fluid ball at the foot and often useful for his partners whether it is to offer them solutions by his races or to serve them. On the goal of Goué, he also combined the two with a good call and then a well -felt pass inward. Barcola, on the other hand, had real waste in the last gesture, a constant in recent weeks, and had trouble in the second period to keep the same level but he also served very well Mayulu on the second goal. Defensively, it was impeccable, notably signing a superb return to the surface in front of Nego.
KVARATSKHELIA replaced him, first on the left and then to the right, and he signed a much average starter, losing more balloons than he made any differences.
[ad_2]