[ad_1]
As she got into the habit, the Technical Arbitration Department (DTA) published a report on the disputed decisions of the last day of Ligue 1. She recognized two refereeing errors on the Reims-Strasbourg (0-1) and Lens-Saint-Étienne (1-0).
It may not calm the anger of Jean-Pierre Caillot. But President Rémois may feel understood after the publication, Tuesday evening, of the report of the Technical Department of Arbitration (DTA) on the decisions of the 28th day of the Ligue 1.. His report recognizes that Reims should have benefited from a penalty for a valentin barco fault on Junya Ito in the additional time of the Reims-Strasbourg meeting (0-1), Sunday.
“The analysis of the video referee is summary and insufficient”, notes the DTA
Clément Turpin, central referee, had not whistled and the Var said he was right after having briefly analyzed the situation, as revealed by the discussion put online by the DTA. “No, it's good,” said Var assistant in Mr. Turpin's headset. “Control finished, Clem. Ras, be careful behind.” Video assistants refer to the altercation that followed the action and comfort Mr. Turpin in his sanctions (yellow for Ito, Red for Moreira and Gbane). “Everything is ok for what you did.”
An opinion not at all shared by the DTA which firmly pinning the Var for its eagerness. “The analysis of the video referee is summary and insufficient: a viewing by the field was expected to correct the initial decision and resume the game with a penalty,” concludes the report. A dry conclusion but less colorful than that used by Jean-Pierre Caillot to deplore this error, Sunday at the end of the match. “We pay the Var but the person had to be, as in advertising, eating a hamburger,” he said in particular.
Ojediran's sole seems to impress the Var referees … which finally decide not to sanction it red
This undistred penalty is not the only error of the weekend noted by the DTA. She believes that the Lensois Hamzat Ojediran should have been excluded after having had an involuntary but very dangerous kick in the face of the Stéphanois Ibrahima Wadji. At first, the action impresses the Var referees who blow several times at the sight of the impact. After having verified “the intensity” of the gesture, they validate the central referee's decision to have inflicted only a yellow by believing that Ojeridan has not put “the sole”. An error for the DTA.
“The final decision is clearly wrong because the gesture of the player Lensois n ° 15, made in an uncontrolled manner, at an inconsiderate height compared to the proximity of the head of the Stéphanese player and with direct contact of the sole on the face of the opponent, clearly puts the physical integrity of the latter in danger. A recourse to video assistance by the field was expected in this situation in order to exclude the faulty player.”
[ad_2]
